However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 25, 2013, at around 22:14, the Defendant: (a) considered that the victim E (a 48 years of age) is fling with F that is the president of the above main shop for the purpose of calculating the drinking value; and (b) fing finging with F that “I wish to do finging to do finging with president,” and fing finging with the victim’s table, the Defendant finged with the victim’s head.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as heat that requires treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of probation and community service order;

1. Scope of discretionary punishment: One year and six months-15 years;

2. 2 years and 4 years in the basic sphere of the scope of the recommended sentences for the sentencing criteria [decision of types], group of violent crimes, special injury [the scope of the recommended fields and the scope of the recommended sentences].

3. The above punishment shall be determined by taking into consideration the following facts: (a) there is no previous conviction or heavier than the suspended sentence; (b) one million won deposited by the victim; and (c) the victim was under the influence of alcohol and was unaware of the reason when drinking.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.