A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,00,00, Defendant B, C, and D, respectively, by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Defendant

A The representative director of E, Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant D, the director of the above company, and Defendant D, the director of the above company, F, G, H, and I, under the direction of Defendant A, are service employees mobilized by Defendant D.

Defendant

A, along with the victim J, during the course of the joint development of the said site site K in Young-si District K (hereinafter “instant construction site”), the development was interrupted due to the occurrence of the dispute, and the victim J, upon obtaining permission, has placed the security service provider M of the security service company managed by the victim L and managed the construction site. Defendant A filed an application against the victim J to the Suwon District Court for a provisional injunction against obstruction of construction (2017Kahap1039) to the effect that “the victim J would no longer occupy the instant construction site and continue the construction work,” but the said application was dismissed by the court.

The defendant A mobilized service personnel at the construction site to enter the construction site of this case without permission and to carry out the construction work.

At around 10:00 on May 26, 2017, the Defendants: (a) opened the pents installed on the boundary of the construction site of this case, and opened the pents installed on May 26, 2017 at the construction site of this case at the site of this case at the site of this case, and obstructed the victim’s L/C security service, such as the victim’s security instructor, who carried out security service, without permission, entering the construction site of this case without permission, disregarding the victim’s access control.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with service personnel F, G, H, and I to interfere with the victim L's L's guard service by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to L/J;

1. Application of CD’s film-related statutes;

1. Defendants: Articles 314 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Detention at a workhouse;