A. misunderstanding of facts and legal principles 1) Although the Defendant sent the text message to the victim D as stated in paragraph 2 of the instant facts charged, the transmission of the above text message does not constitute a threat of harm and injury as stated in the crime of intimidation, and in light of the victim’s age, relationship with the Defendant, etc., the Defendant’s act does not contravene social norms.

2) The Defendant did not pose a threat to the victim as stated in paragraph (3) of the instant facts charged.

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (one million won penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. Regarding the assertion of misunderstanding of legal principles, the term "in the crime of intimidation" refers to the notification of harm to the extent that it may cause fear to an ordinary person, and the notification of harm to the extent that it may be deemed possible to establish a crime of intimidation must be made at least. Even if there is a malicious notice, if it is acceptable in light of social customs and ethical norms, etc., the crime of intimidation is not established. However, whether there was an intentional act of intimidation or intimidation should be determined by taking into account not only the external appearance of the act, but also the circumstances leading to such act, such as the background leading up to such act, relationship with the victim, etc. (see Supreme Court Decision 2011Do2412, May 26, 201, etc.). According to evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, according to the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, the defendant wants to see the victim on the ground that the victim filed a civil complaint against the Defendant's work on July 29, 2016.

“The facts of intimidation” (Article 1 of the facts charged of this case recognized by the defendant), and the defendant thereafter

9. 17. The victim, like paragraph 2 of the facts charged in this case, “The victim will pay for the amount of the response.”