However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 2, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 2.5 million won due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (overtakeing Vehicle), violation of the Road Traffic Act (overtakeing Vehicle), violation of the Road Traffic Act (overtakeing Vehicle), violation of the Road Traffic Act (overtakeing Vehicle), violation of the Road Traffic Act (overtakeing Vehicle), and violation of the Road Traffic Act (overtakeing Vehicle), violation of the Road Traffic Act (overtakeing Vehicle), violation of the Road Traffic Act (overtakeing Vehicle), violation of the Road Traffic Act (overtakeing Vehicle), and violation of the Road Traffic Act (overtakeing Vehicle), violation of the Road Traffic Act (overtakeing Vehicle), and the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 1 year and 2 years due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (overtakeing Vehicle), in the same court on February 18, 2009. < Amended by Act No. 11583, Jul. 18, 2012>

At around 02:50 on September 23, 2015, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving a Dap car, was under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.127% in blood in front of the D cafeteria located in the Gu-U.S. city, without a driver’s license, and was driving the said Dap car in the same manner as the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.127% in blood, and was driving in one way among the two-lanes in the direction of the Yellow Apartment apartment in the direction of the cultural residential apartment on the surface of the gas station.

In this case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely operate the steering gear by properly operating the steering gear and steering gear.

In this regard, Defendant 1 was negligent in neglecting the breath and right and right and right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and interest of the

The Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, suffered from the injury to the victim G (19) and H (20) of the victim E as well as the injury of the victim E, while suffering from the cryp and tension in need of approximately two weeks of treatment respectively, and at the same time the victim E.