임금 및 퇴직금청구
1. The defendant,
A. From July 1, 2012 to July 14, 2012, Plaintiff (Appointed Party) KRW 59,175,141 as well as its related amount.
The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the remaining designated parties were employed by the Defendant Company and retired while serving as stated in the service period of each of the following table. However, they did not receive the same wages and retirement allowances as stated in each of the following table.
The Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff’s annual wages from June 30, 2012, 59, 175, 1412 B B 2 B B B B B B B B B B B B on March 1, 2012, 30, June 30, 2012, 53, 228, 653 D 4 D 202 on April 1, 2012, 2013 to the 5th day after the date of retirement from office, 121, 366, 8795 E, to the 5th day after the date of retirement from office, and to the 5th day after the date of retirement from the 5th day after the date of retirement from the 5th day after the 5th day after the 2013th day of retirement from the 5th day of February 28, 2013, and to the 5th day after the date of retirement from office.
[3] Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act provides that the defendant did not submit a written objection to the purport that he/she is dissatisfied with the payment order and did not appear on the date of pleading without submitting a written answer disputing the plaintiff (appointed party). Thus, the facts constituting the cause of the claim pursuant to Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act, and only the matters necessary to specify the claim pursuant to Article 208(