2. Although the Defendant made a confession and reflect on the instant crime, the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing the female sex, and in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture, it is necessary to cut off and impose severe punishment on the proprietor operating illegal sexual traffic establishments. The Defendant committed the act of arranging sexual traffic at the same place as the instant case and was sentenced to a fine of three million won around 2009, a fine of five million won around 201, a fine of five million won on September 12, 201, and a suspended sentence of one year on September 12, 201, each of which was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the said suspended sentence period. In full view of the following facts, the Defendant’s repeated act of arranging sexual traffic during the said suspended sentence period, the period of criminal acts revealed in the records and pleadings, the size of profits acquired through the criminal acts, the Defendant’s age, family circumstances before and after the Defendant’s criminal acts, etc.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.