beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2016.05.12 2016고단73

교통사고처리특례법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 30, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Changwon District Court’s smuggling support on December 30, 2013, and on April 14, 2015, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for the same crime in the same court.

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in CAR test, in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the Violation of the Road Traffic Act, and the Violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving).

Without a driver's license, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol level 0.14% in blood, was driven on January 1, 2015 by two lanes from the fishery ririth to the white rithm.

At the time, since there is a long time around the city, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to thoroughly see the front hour, and to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the brakes and other devices of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to drive a driving on the roadside while driving, and did not discover the G Glelow-car of the victim Franchis that was stopped on the right side of the direction of the Defendant’s proceeding, and received the back part of the victim’s vehicle with the front part of the vehicle driven by the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as high-quality salt, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment, due to the above occupational division and room.

2. A person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act shall not operate a vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance, but the Defendant was driving the vehicle so detached as stated in paragraph (1) at the time and place as stated in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the detection of a primary driver;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Inquiry into mandatory insurance;

1. A previous conviction in judgment: