beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.12.24 2014나15446

손해배상금

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases, and thus, it shall accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Each entry of the evidence of Nos. 1 through 25 of “B” (including each number, if any) is written only on the ground of No. 20 of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance on the part of the court of first instance, “B” shall be written only by the evidence submitted by the plaintiff.

The reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance shall be as follows: < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 11011, Mar. 3, 201>

According to the statements of "A" and evidence Nos. 2, 3, 1 through 4, and 6 through 9 (including each number), it is recognized that the defendant received benefits under the name of "E," and submitted a resignation in the name of "E Representative A", but the defendant is actually working for "F as an accounting employee of G operated by the defendant, and it seems that the defendant did not have worked for the plaintiff. G was operated by the original F, but the F's creditor was allowed to participate in the operation of the G, and the plaintiff was deemed to have operated the G, and the F, D, and the plaintiff was deemed to have participated in the operation of the G, claiming that the plaintiff acquired the right to operate the G, and that the location of the business site of "E" and the location of the headquarters and the business site of "E" of "E, Nam-dong-gu, and that the plaintiff was merely a suspicion of occupational embezzlement against F, D, and the defendant, but all of the disposition was issued."

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.