A. On January 25, 2013, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to C orchard 3,395 square meters (hereinafter “Defendant’s land”) in Jeju-si, respectively, on December 17, 2013, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the land of 2,909 square meters (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s land”).

B. The Plaintiff’s land is not adjacent to the road, and can only pass through another adjacent land on the road.

【Non-contentious facts, Gap evidence 1-2, and the result of the examination by this court

2. 원고의 주장 원고는 원고 토지의 경작 등을 위하여 별지 도면 표시 ㅍ1, ㄱ2, ㄴ2, ㄷ2, ㄹ2, ㅁ2, ㅂ2, ㅁ1, ㅂ1, ㅅ1, ㅇ1, ㅈ1, ㅊ1, ㅋ1, ㅌ1, ㅍ1의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 (나) 부분(폭 2.5m)을 이용하여 공로로 출입하고자 하므로 위 토지 부분에 관한 주위토지통행권 확인을 구한다.

3. Determination

A. The right of passage over surrounding land is particularly recognized at the risk of damage to the owner of the land under way for the public interest, which is the use of land without a passage necessary for its use between the public interest and the public interest. In determining the width, location, etc. of the passage road, the method of causing less damage to the owner of the land under way should be considered. In a specific case, the degree of necessity should be determined based on the geographical, location, and utilization of the land under ordinary social norms, neighboring geographical and locational features, neighboring geographical state, understanding of the users of the land under way, and other all other relevant circumstances.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2008Da75300, 75317, 75324 Decided June 11, 2009, etc.) B.

위 법리에 비추어 이 사건에 관하여 보건대, 앞서 거시한 각 증거에다가 을 1 내지 6호증(가지번호 포함), 을 8호증의 1 내지 4의 각 기재에 변론 전체의 취지를 보태어 살펴볼 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정들을 종합하면, 원고에게 피고 토지 중 별지 도면 표시 ㅌ1, ㅋ1, ㅊ1, ㅈ1, ㅇ1, ㅅ1, ㅂ1의 각 점을 연결한 지적...