대여금
1. As to KRW 262,573,426 and KRW 166,756,00 among them, the Defendant shall annually pay to the Plaintiff KRW 262,57,426 from March 2, 2016 to April 11, 2016.
1. Determination on the cause of the claim
A. The facts stated in the reasons for the attachment of the facts of recognition do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged by taking into account the whole purport of the pleadings in the entries in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, and 4.
B. According to the above facts of determination, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the principal and interest of KRW 262,573,426 (interest rate of KRW 166,756,00 as of March 1, 2016) and KRW 166,756,00 as of the loan principal of KRW 166,75,00 from March 2, 2016 following the above basic date to April 11, 2016, the delivery date of the original copy of the payment order of this case, 13.05% per annum with overdue interest rate of KRW 13.05% per annum, and from the following day to the date of full payment, 15% per annum as prescribed by the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings.
2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion
A. The defendant asserts that the loan of this case was signed in the form of the loan transaction agreement of this case, and the loan of this case was received by the Korea Assets Trust Corporation, which is the seller, and that the loan of this case is a collective loan of this case, and thus, it is not liable as it is stated as
However, such circumstance alone cannot be enough to exempt the obligation to pay the principal and interest of this case.
B. The Defendant asserts that the instant loan transaction agreement was concluded by the Defendant for the payment of intermediate payment of Bteltel sales contract concluded with Korea Asset Trust Co., Ltd., and that the instant loan transaction agreement is terminated if the said sales contract is canceled or cancelled, and that the instant loan transaction agreement becomes effective. The Korea Asset Trust Co., Ltd. is obligated to pay the principal and interest directly to the Plaintiff.
However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the above sales contract was cancelled or cancelled, and thus, the sales contract was lost in a lawsuit claiming the cancellation or cancellation of the sales contract (Supreme Court Decision 2015. 2015.