However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 13, 2015, at around 18:43, the Defendant: (a) driven two lanes of the three-lanes in front of the present church located in Guro-gu Seoul, Guro-gu, 346 (3) in front of the present church from the side of the side of the side of the side of the 3-lane 40 kilometers; (b) changed the course of the CUT125XK to the one-lane. In such a case, the person engaged in driving service was notified of the change of course by direction, hand, etc.; (c) notified of the change of course in advance; and (d) checked the safety of another vehicle; and (d) neglected the duty of care to drive, the Defendant was negligent in driving the vehicle along the one-lane of the victim D (33 years) (33 years) to exchange the front part of the front part of the vehicle with the back part of the Defendant, thereby causing damage to the victim, etc., and (d) the latter part of the 90-wheeled vehicle was damaged by the victim, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statements made by witnesses D in the sixth public trial records;

1. Results of the verification of black stay images in this Court;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each traffic accident occurrence report, estimates, traffic accident reports, investigation reports (Submission of final diagnosis reports);

1. Article 3 (1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following extenuating circumstances in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Services Criminal Act refers to the defendant's access to a bus-only lane in violation of the lane without notifying the change of course due to direction, loss, etc., and without confirming the safe driving of the tea at the time of entry, resulting in the occurrence of the accident in this case. The victim suffered serious injury in the downcoming horse, and the victim is the defendant.