A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant, while making an investment in real estate, agreed that the price will be borne as they become one-half of the remaining profits after deducting the principal invested by each party when making profits are generated. Although there is no provision regarding the allocation of losses, Article 711 of the Civil Code concerning the Mutual Association shall also be applied mutatis mutandis to the apportionment of losses, they shall bear one-half of the same amount as the apportionment of profits.

B. 1) The Plaintiff is a commercial building No. 101 Dong-dong 105, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon (hereinafter “C Prize”) to the Defendant.

) On February 24, 2009, KRW 10,000, KRW 10,000, KRW 15,000 on March 25, 2009, KRW 15,000 on June 15, 2009, and KRW 37,500,000 on around April 2, 2009, including the Defendant’s payment of KRW 3,50,000 at the Defendant’s surgery expenses, etc. The Defendant’s share out of KRW 16,250,00 (the Plaintiff’s share out of KRW 50,00,000, KRW 15,000 on the dividend from D’s property x KRW 305,05,00 on the settlement of accounts after the completion of investment x KRW 16,250,00 on the grounds that the Defendant’s share in KRW 50,005,05,00 on the settlement of accounts is 05,00505.

[2] The Plaintiff is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff KRW 3,460,00 (Attorney Fees: KRW 2,200,000, KRW 365,000, KRW 330,000, KRW 330,000, KRW 50,000, KRW 50,000, and KRW 50,000, KRW 730,000, and KRW 500,000, the credit information company) in filing a lawsuit claiming the return of custody amount against D related to D (Seoul Central District Court Decision 2010Da204624, Seoul Central District Court Decision 201Na6464).

C. 1) On November 27, 2009, the Defendant moved 201 of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, G, H, and I’s Jin Housing (hereinafter “J Housing”).

agency. The agency shall independently.