The sentencing of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

In light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant made a confession of all the crimes of this case while committing the crime of this case; and (b) the Defendant is merely 20 years old and still has been subject to punishment and juvenile protective disposition several times due to the same crime; (c) the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for six months due to the same kind of crime and completed the execution of the sentence; (d) the victims committed the crime of this case; (e) the Defendant was a majority of the victims; and (e) the victims did not recover from or reach an agreement on damage to the victims; and (e) other various circumstances, which are the conditions of sentencing specified in the records and arguments, such as the motive and background of the crime of this case; (e) the circumstances after the crime of this case; and (e) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, etc., the sentencing of the lower

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition