A shall be punished by a fine of 50,000 won, and a fine of 300,000 won, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Defendant

A and Defendant B are not known to each other.

1. On July 16, 2016, Defendant A assaulted with the victim on the ground that he/she was infected by the victim B (39 years old, female)’s growth in a neck that he/she used in 1012 and her mother in front of the exit station of the subway No. 7 hours, as Gangdong-gu Seoul, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, on the ground that his/her mother was infected by the victim B (39 years old, female).

2. Defendant B, at the same time and place as the above 1.1. paragraph, assaulted with the victim A (20 years of age, female, and the victim’s body by scambling the victim’s body by hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of Defendant A and some of Defendant B’s legal statement

1. The legal statement of the witness A and D;

1. Application of CCTV CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the Defendants’ choice of punishment regarding criminal facts: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act; selection of fines

1. Defendants detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act [Defendant B and his/her defense counsel] claim that Defendant A did not have any tightly-friendly relationship with Defendant A, and D was pushed down with his/her left arms.

From 19:20:51 of CCTV CDs, at the time when Defendant A was pushed to the port, D’s hand is checked to the port, but D’s hand does not seem to be a part of Defendant A, and rather D’s hand to the port as aground for Defendant A’s hand, rather D’s hand to the port.

Rather, until before Defendant A was pushed down, there has been a conflict between the Defendants until before Defendant A was pushed down, and the degree of dispute has been serious since Defendant A was pushed down, and there is no reason to keep Defendant A, who is his/her father, part of Defendant A, and the statement made by Defendant A and D, i.e., the contents of Defendant A and A, that Defendant A was pushed down, and that Defendant A was pushed back, and that it is consistent from the investigative agency to this court ( even though the court of this case in particular, the detailed method of assault, in the court of this case, is limited.