Seized evidence 1 to 16 shall be confiscated.

Seized evidence No. 40-.

On January 23, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to four years of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. at the Daegu District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on August 25, 2012.

1. On November 3, 2014, the Defendant destroyed special property: (a) discovered a car in the victim E-owned line, which was parked at the “D cafeteria” parking lot located in Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu; (b) removed a bus emergency escape watch using a dangerous device that was previously possessed for the purpose of thefting the property in the vehicle, and then damaged the said car glass amounting to KRW 400,000 won; and (c) from that time until February 14, 2017, the Defendant destroyed the car glass amounting to KRW 1-12,14-17,19-24, and KRW 27,000,000, in total, as indicated in the “D cafeteria” parking lot; and (d) destroyed the car glass which was owned by the victim by 13,294,323,00 won.

2. On November 3, 2014, at around 03:27, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the glass window of the victim E, the victim E, who was parked in the “D cafeteria” parking lot located in Daegu Suwon-gu, by using the network for emergency escape from buses; (b) cut off the amount of KRW 300,000,000 at the market price of the said vehicle, which is the victim owned by the victim; and (c) cut off the amount of USD 20,000,000 and KRW 100,000 in cash, from that time until February 14, 2017, the Defendant stolen the property owned by 30,000 won in total, including the list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Each statement of E, G, H, I, K, K, L, M, M, N, P, Q, R, T, U, V, W, X,Y, Z, AAB, AC, AD, AE, AE, AF, AG, and H;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Each investigation report (with respect to the same satisfaction with respect to the CCTV image verification, relating to the attachment of a vehicle damage estimate, relating to the attachment of a vehicle for the identification of a suspect, with respect to the identification of a suspected suspect, with respect to the specification of a suspected vehicle and the submission of a estimate of the damaged vehicle, with respect to the same identity of the suspect;

1. Before judgment: The defendant's legal statement;