On September 19, 2008, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath in the Busan District Court 353, the Busan District Court 2008 High Court 2008 High Court 288 High Court 2880 against B as a witness of the Defendant case.

In front of the Busan District Court judge at the trial of this case, the defendant testified that "B, at the time of the domination, did not have toilets adjacent to the seaside because there is no room for the seashores at the time, and C took a bath theory, moved head debt, moved to the main room, and her face to the decline." Therefore, the defendant testified that "B, at the time of the fighting, B, I got D and two people followed B."

However, in fact, at the site of fact, the defendant and B together and inflicted injury on C, and D did not have assaulted B.

Nevertheless, as above, the Defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised the above evidence.

Summary of Evidence

omitted.

Application of Statutes

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

Article 152(1) of the Criminal Act (Appointment of Imprisonment)