However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 6, 2016, the Defendant, at the main point of Gangseo-si B, 2, and 3:30, from the victim D ( South, 52 years old), “I kn't kn't kn't.

Now has been found on the date;

D.In the Republic of Korea, I would like to do so;

The Republic of Korea has been trying to cover up;

E.S. Doz. Doz. Doz.

“Along with the end of “A”, the two main remains, which are dangerous objects in that place, were collected to the victim’s entrance, and the two main remains, which are dangerous objects in that place, were collected to the victim’s head, and the victim’s head was removed from several times, and the victim’s head was put into an open upper part of the number of days of treatment, and the two main points were open to the victim.

Defendant carried dangerous objects as above and inflicted injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the prosecution and the examination of suspects of D;

1. 112 A list of reported cases;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (in cases of attaching, such as on-site inspection and accompanying photographs, C's search and investigation, photogrammatic images, medical records, etc. on the upper part of the body taken at the time of the D examination, and listening to witness's statement);

1. Article 258-2 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Articles 258-2 and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act that choose a penalty;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The punishment against the defendant shall be determined and the execution of a sentence shall be suspended on the condition that the defendant shall be subject to protection and observation and social service work for a considerable period of time, taking into account the extenuating circumstances after the crime of this case, etc. in light of the following factors: (a) the reason reflectiveness of the sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act; (b) the relationship with the victim and the agreement with the victim; (c) the defendant’s health condition and family environment favorable to the victim; (d) the contents and frequency of the same military force of the