When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant, C, and D meta-ro, on June 25, 2016, and around 03:30 on or around 03:30 on 25, 2016, the victim G (23 h) and the victim H (23 h h) who sought to use the above convenience points while drinking the World Cup before the F convenience store in Y-gu, Ora-si, Ora-si, and the victim considered the victims as the victims, and the defendant argued that they want to use the above convenience points, and C h h h h h h h h h h h h h, C h h h h h h h h h h h h h h, and D h h h h h h h h h h h h h h. When the victim's h h h k h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h.

As a result, the Defendant and C and D jointly inflicted injury on the victim H, such as brain salvy in need of treatment between about two weeks, and they inflict injury on the victim G, such as a 4 dump bombed sale, which require treatment between about four weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the police officers in H, G, I, D, and C (including the whole part);

1. Each police statement concerning J, K, L, and M;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 2 (2) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 2 of the same Act concerning the selection of a punishment, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257 of the Criminal Act, the selection of a fine;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;