교통사고처리특례법위반(치사)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The sentencing of the lower court (two years of suspended execution of one year and forty hours of law-abiding driving lecture) on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.
2. The Defendant recognized the instant crime, and agreed with the victim’s bereaved family members.
However, as the defendant neglected to stop in the preceding week, the defendant left the passenger car of the victim of the freight lane by negligence, which led to a serious result of the victim's death.
In full view of the following circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive, background, means and consequence of the crime, etc., and the fact that there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may change the sentencing of the lower court after the crime, the lower court’s sentencing is not unfair.
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.