The defendant filed an application for compensation with C in the amount of KRW 30 million, and the application for compensation with D.

The Defendant is a person who worked as an insurance designer in the ING insurance company from March 2014 to April 2018.

On June 2017, the Defendant was forced to recover allowances due to the lapse of the contract from the above ING insurance company, resulting in economic difficulties, and became subject to the obligation of several million won from the lending company and the land, due to the decline in gambling.

Accordingly, the defendant had attempted to deceiving insurance customers as if they had a good profitability in investment, and to acquire money as investment money.

On April 14, 2018, the Defendant may pay a minimum of 10% profit to the Victim F by telephone at a non-displace on April 14, 2018, if the Defendant made an investment in G companies that make the autonomous driving vehicle-related traffic card listed in the U.S. A. with the victim F.

Equitable investment is a good opportunity.

“A false statement” was made.

However, the Defendant was subject to the full recovery of the allowances at that time, and the amount of debt of the lending company reaches several million won, and even if receiving the investment from the damaged party, it was intended to use it as gambling fund, and there was no intention or ability to guarantee the principal and the profit by making an investment.

The Defendant, on April 14, 2018, received a remittance of the total of KRW 30 million, including KRW 10 million, around April 15, 2018, and KRW 20 million, around April 15, 2018, and acquired KRW 473,50,000 from the total of 39 victims from around June 30, 2017 to April 16, 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The details of Kakao Stockholm messages, identification certificates, and F's statement made by the police;

1. The details of H's complaint, records of victim's statement, etc., transfer confirmation, and Kakao Stockholm;

1. The Kakao Stockholm conversation (Evidence No. 79 pages), the police statement protocol of I, and a certificate of transfer confirmation;

1. The Kakao Stockholm content, details of transfer, and statement by J police;

1. K’s complaint;