A. 1) Plaintiff A is a student who was admitted to I High School on 2017. 2) Plaintiff B and C is the parent of Plaintiff A, Plaintiff E and F are the grandparent of Plaintiff E and Plaintiff G, Plaintiff’s mother of Plaintiff A, Plaintiff Plaintiff’s mother of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff D are the siblings of Plaintiff A.

3) The Defendant’s Act on the Prevention of and Compensation for School Safety Accidents (hereinafter “School Safety Act”)

b) On June 2, 2017, the Plaintiff A was diagnosed to have the tear of the frontmost of the left-hand slot and the inner half of the string, and was performed on June 19, 2017, as an accident that happens in the event of an accident and the payment of medical care benefits to the students, etc., who were damaged by the life and body due to a school safety accident, and was conducted a string operation on the part of the first high school head. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 28204, Jun. 19, 2017>

2) On September 5, 2017, the Defendant decided to pay the deductible benefits for the medical expenses incurred in relation to the instant accident. C. (1) The Plaintiffs filed the instant lawsuit against the Defendant seeking disability benefits (daily profit and consolation money) under the School Safety Act by asserting that there was a disability in the rest of work against the Plaintiff A.

2) The instant court entrusted the National Health Insurance Corporation Japanese Industrial Hospital with the physical assessment of the Plaintiff A. The results and the results of the fact-finding inquiry inquiry. The results are as follows: (a) The pre-defeasible safety of the Plaintiff’s accident 6m compared to the dry side is observed as a result of the stress test on the part of the accident committed by the Plaintiff A (2m per left and 8m per left side).

) The treatment is based on credit, the treatment of which is completed, but it constitutes a permanent disability with no possibility of reliance. - This constitutes class 12 under the State Compensation Act (under the School Safety Act, the degree of loss of labor force constitutes 15% according to the degree of loss of labor force, and according to the Mablo’s Schedule of Loss Evaluation of Labor Capacity, the ratio of loss of labor force to class 4-1 of