Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 25,000 won shall be one day.

On August 19, 2017, the Defendant: (a) on August 19, 2017, 19:50, 19:50 LUG LUG 4 LUGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of witness E in the third public trial protocol;

1. Statement made by C by the witness in the fourth public trial protocol;

1. C’s statement;

1. The defendant's receipt [the defendant requested 8,300 won excessively from 8,800 won by a taxi engineer to investigate the illegality thereof, and there is a justifiable reason for not giving rise to the fact that the defendant did not pay a taxi fee because he requested 9,800 won excessively.

The argument is asserted.

However, even if it is ordinarily the same section, 9,800 won can not be seen as unfair charges because there is a difference in the fare depending on the location of passengers, the signal lights, and the flow of traffic, and 2. Whether C has left a taxi due to the reason that the defendant was shouldered at the time.

c) fraud.

Money shall not be paid.

In full view of the following facts: (a) the police officer consistently stated that he/she came to F District by consistently stating that he/she came to go to the F District; and (c) the police officer E also stated that “the Defendant was unable to pay the taxi fee without any string any string any string of the strings while he/she was going to go to go to the string of the subway; and (b) he/she did not talk with the string of the strings; and (c) the police officer stated that he/she was unable to pay the strings without any justifiable reason.”

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on the Punishment of Minor Offenses, Article 3 (1) 39 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and Selection of fines for the crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act involving Costs of Trial;