실종아동등의보호및지원에관한법률위반
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who has a friendship with B.
No person shall protect a missing child, etc. without any justifiable reason without reporting to the head of the police agency.
Nevertheless, around 06:00 on June 17, 2017, the Defendant lived with B ( South, 16 years old) from 206 dong 1901, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, but by October 1, 201, the Defendant was living together with B, including accommodation.
Accordingly, the defendant protected the missing child B without any justifiable reason without reporting it to the head of the police office.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each statement protocol with respect to E and B;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (to hear the statement of victim-friendly F statement), report internal investigation (to provide cooperation to the department of sexual intercourse and to the suspected suspect's telephone);
1. Article 17 and 7 of the Act on the Protection of and Support for Missing Children, etc. who are subject to the relevant criminal facts, and Articles 17 and 7 of the same Act, and the selection of fines;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was that the Defendant recognized the crime, and that there was no record of criminal punishment other than the punishment of a fine due to the crime of this type. However, the Defendant stated that the Defendant was aware of B at NAV’s sexual intercourse meeting, B was a child of 16 years of age, and that the Defendant returned to B when he was on duty.
However, in consideration of the fact that the situation of returning home actively, such as reporting to the police or contact with the parents of B, is not confirmed, and that the period of protecting B remains for three months, the amount of fine under the summary order is not excessive, and thus, the sentence shall be determined like the order.