If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On July 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the Defendant on July 8, 2017, 112, stating that he was under the influence of alcohol in front of a convenience store C in the area of convenience store C; and (b) that he was called out after receiving a report from the Defendant.

The circumstances where the police station D police box was assigned to the above E without any reason, with the shoulder of the defendant.

This son, while having expressed his desire to "I have to do so", he assaulted at one time the left side of the above E at the same time.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Notification to the department related to the report of 112 case;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to patrol boxes and video materials CDs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of a selective fine for punishment (a case in which a police officer shouldered a defendant who was locked on the street while under the influence of alcohol)

According to Article 4 of the Act on the Performance of Police Duties by Police Officers, a police officer may take appropriate measures, such as protecting a person who is at risk of harm to his or another person's life or body, by drinking, and the main duties of a police officer are "protection of the people's life, body, and property." A police officer working in a police agency is one of the main duties of a police officer. A police officer working in a police agency is one of the main duties of a police officer. A police officer working in a police agency is likely to anticipate the exercise of tangible power to a certain extent. The degree of assault by a defendant is relatively significant.

In light of the fact that the mind appears to be a contingent action before the separation of the mind due to the crime that was committed immediately after the locking from the state of the drinking, it is considered that the mind appears to be a contingent action.

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;