If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. From Apr. 2, 2011, the Defendant:

5. By December 12, 198, the victim obstructed the traffic of the construction vehicle by setting up stone and trees at the edge of an access road on the ground that the access road created prior to the dwelling area of the defendant of Gyeonggi-gun is used without permission for using the access road on which the land owned by the defendant is expropriated.

2. As set forth in paragraph 1, the victim interfered with the work of the site of electric power resource by delaying the construction of electric power resource and causing additional freight to be incurred.

Summary of Evidence

1. Testimony of witnesses D, E, F, and G;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business), Article 185 of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with traffic), the selection of fines;

1. Commercial concurrence: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of punishment: Selection of a fine;

1. In light of the following circumstances revealed in the grounds for conviction of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act: (a) the Defendant was found to have interfered with traffic and interfered with construction work in light of the following circumstances: (b) the Defendant’s own dry field and the boundary line of the road to prevent him from passing through 15 tons, 2.5 tons, and 2.5 tons; (c) the Defendant was allowed from the road that it was originally intended to pass through the vehicle; (d) it was difficult for the vehicle to pass by the construction site because the width of the bridge going through the construction site is narrow but it was not easy for the vehicle to pass by the construction site; and (e) the Defendant received five million won in return for the above stones from D.