If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On December 7, 2017, at around 22:05, the Defendant assaulted the victim C (the 18-year-old-old-old-old) who was getting Ortoba in front of Gangseo-gu Busan (the 18-year-old-old-gu) and the victim during the time of vision, “Influence, fluencing the eye, fluencing-in, flusing-in, flusing-in, flusing-in, flusing-in, flusing-in, flusing-in, and flusing-in, flusing-in, fla

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the Act on the Legal Statement of Witness C

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The defendant's defense counsel on the assertion of justifiable acts under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act in the custody of the workhouse asserts that the defendant's act is only one kind of relationship with the victim's head in order to make the victim take off with the victim's driver and take a discipline, and that it constitutes a justifiable act that does not violate social rules.

However, according to evidence, even though the defendant did not face the victim's offba, it is recognized that the defendant committed assault against the victim as stated in the facts of crime while taking a bath to the victim without any specific reason, and considering the means and method of the crime of this case, the degree of damage, the situation before and after the crime, etc., the above assertion cannot be viewed as a justifiable act that does not violate the social rules, and thus, it is rejected.

The reason for sentencing is that the defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime, but the result of serious injury to the victim did not occur, and the attitude against his mistake was shown in the trial process.