If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

1. On May 21, 2012, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) borrowed money from “D” office located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, from “D” office; (b) written the name of “G”, which is the Defendant’s form, in the joint and several surety column of Chapter 1 of the monetary loan contract for consumption of KRW 70,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, and affixed the seal of G, which was in advance,

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a letter of cash loan contract in the name of G, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant: (a) borrowed money from Company E at the date, time, and place under Paragraph (1); and (b) delivered the forged monetary loan contract to H, the representative director E, as if it was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in the first protocol of trial;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a monetary loan for consumption (No. 6 of the evidence, and no. 56 of the investigation record);

1. Relevant Articles 231 and 231 of the Criminal Act and Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the occupation of exercising a falsified investigation document and the choice of fines) concerning criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;