When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 6, 2016, the Defendant reported a false fact to the police officer who received the phone call 112 on the cell phone, stating that “the driver is suspected of drinking, and the driver is suspected of drinking, because the driver was able to drive the vehicle on behalf of the driver in front of the filling station in Ulsan-gu B, Ulsan-gu, U.S., the Defendant, while driving the vehicle on behalf of the driver in front of the driver in front of the driver in front of the vehicle in question, D was not able to pay the substitute driving fee while under the influence of alcohol.” The Defendant reported the fact to the effect that D was not guilty of driving the vehicle in front of the driver in front of the filling station in Ulsan-gu, U.S., U.S., and that D was not subject to criminal punishment.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

112 Application of the order to deal with reported cases;

1. Relevant Article 156 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 156 of the Criminal Act selecting a fine, and the choice of

1. Articles 157, 153, and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act to be mitigated by law;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;