beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.10.25 2012고단6931

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

1. Defendant A

(a) The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

(b)Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person operating a game room called "F Gameland" in Gwangju Mine-gu E, and Defendant B is a person in charge of money exchange in the above game room.

1. Defendant A, unlike the contents of rating in the above game room from July 26, 2012 to August 3, 2012, 2012, automatically performed a game regardless of user’s manipulation or ability, Defendant A provided game products with contents different from the contents of rating by installing ea Sarch3 game machine 48 units, which were modified by installing ea Sararch3 game machine in a flexible manner, and offered B (a) as follows.

2. As described in paragraph (1), as in the case of G, etc., customers such as G et al. engaged in money exchange business of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products by implied approval for money exchange of item cards in KRW 4,500 per sheet.

2. On August 3, 2012, Defendant B: (a) around August 3, 2012, the Defendant: (b) carried on games by customers G, etc. in the game room and exchanged an item card in KRW 4,500 per head; and (c) carried on money exchange of tangible or intangible outcomes acquired through the use of game products as a business for money exchange.

As to this, the above defendant asserts to the purport that he is not guilty, because he only purchased item cards from customers who want to play games in the game of this case, and did not engage in money exchange business.

However, according to the evidence duly adopted and the examination of evidence by this court, the above defendant stated that he purchased an item card of 66 Chapter G in three times from G on the date of the above control (182 pages of investigation record) and that he purchased each item card of 45,000 won, ② In particular, the above defendant would have paid the price for G out of the game site of this case at the time of control, and ③ the above defendant was seized by holding 10,000 foot No. 94 at that time.