However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On November 3, 2013, the defrauded Co., Ltd.: (a) the Defendant sought funds to develop a factory site as security of 10,948 square meters of G-owned land owned by the Defendant in the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City D building and the office of E Co., Ltd. operated by the Defendant in the second floor; and (b) the victim C seeking funds to develop a factory site as a security of 10,948 square meters of land owned by the Defendant in Gwangju-si.

The interest rate of 2% per month shall be paid, and the principal shall be paid 10% of the loan of 2 billion won in consideration of the fee, on condition that the loan shall be repaid within 2-3 years. D. In order to obtain the loan as soon as possible, the false statement was made that the loan shall be paid KRW 20 million in terms of the agreement to promote the loan business.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to arrange the lending of the above land as collateral, and he received KRW 20 million under the pretext of the contract for the lending business and was a plan to use the above land to repay the defendant's obligation.

On November 6, 2013, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 20 million won from the victim to the single bank account (H) in the name of the Defendant as the agreed amount to promote loan business around November 6, 2013.

2. On November 2015, the Defendant against the victim I would be able to obtain a construction permit by changing the form and quality of land that can be constructed by means of payment of access roads, and make it possible for the victim I to obtain a house by obtaining a construction permit, from the victim I, who had difficulty in constructing two lots and two lots and two lots of land outside of Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and Gangwon-do, Gangwon-do, Seoul, on the other hand, in the influence of the trade name of K2 B in Gwangjin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City around 2015. If the date is not resolved, the amount received will be refunded.

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to obtain a building permit for the above land, and was a plan to use money for the repayment of the defendant's debt with the name of civil engineering design expenses and expenses.

The defendant is the victim as above.