However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On October 16, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 21:20 on October 16, 2014, at the E-place of the victim’s operation of Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, the Defendant: (b) demanded the victim to be injured but was rejected; (c) the Defendant: (d) caused the victim to have the victim wear the above-mentioned 20 minutes of 20 minutes of pedembling, i.e., the Defendant: (a) took a bath to the victim, and (d) took a bath to the victim; (b) caused the victim to remove the above-mentioned things from the floor; and (b) caused the victim to wear the pedembling to the victim for about 20 minutes of 21:40 on the same day, such as threatening to the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's entertainment drinking house business by force.

2. On October 16, 2014, at the place described in paragraph (1), around 21:40 on October 16, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was asked to return home from G (50 years of age) in the F District of the Incheon Bupyeong Police Station, which was called upon 112, and from G and H to return home; (b) he was boarding and leaving the elevator with G and H in the above elevator; and (c) he was able to look at G and H with the above elevator, “I would like to get back the head debt of G in his hand; (d) I would like to see if I would like to get off the elevator; and (e) I would like to get off the body debt of G in his hand; and (e) I would like to arrest the Defendant as an offender in the performance of official duties by notifying the Defendant of the right to refuse to make a statement; and (e) I would like to remove the Defendant’s head debt by asking G and H to the right part of the Defendant’s shape.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the maintenance of public order and arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time, G was placed in a post-box for approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to I, J, G, and H;

1. Photographs taken on the part of an injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act of the relevant Article of the Criminal Act concerning the crime is interference with;