손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
1. Basic facts
A. Defendant B and Vietnam’s nationality were married on June 9, 2014, but Defendant C entered the Republic of Korea as tourism visa (C-3) and was in an illegal stay, in principle, could not obtain permission to change the status of stay in the Republic of Korea as a marriage visa (F-6).
On August 2014, the Defendants introduced the Plaintiff, who is an employee of the D Joint Office, through the early police officer, and requested the Plaintiff to perform duties concerning the application for granting or changing the status of stay of Defendant C and paid the fees.
B. On August 2014 and September 201, the Plaintiff submitted to the Immigration Office a letter of illegal aliens, etc. under the name of Defendant C, and submitted a written application to the Ministry of Justice, etc., but Defendant C did not obtain permission to change the status of stay as a result, and around September 24, 2014, Defendant C did not obtain permission to change the status of stay from the Ministry of Justice. Around September 24, 2014, the Plaintiff was notified that he/she should leave Vietnam and enter the Republic of Korea’s overseas diplomatic missions in Vietnam with a visa for marriage immigrants.
C. On November 2014, the Defendants demanded the Plaintiff to return the fee, but the Plaintiff rejected the request.
Accordingly, the Defendants filed a complaint with an investigative agency with the purport that “the Plaintiff would have the Plaintiff be issued a visa who is able to reside in the Republic of Korea without having been stationed in Vietnam, and received fees by deceiving Defendant C.”
[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2-1 through 8, evidence 4-1, 2, 3, and 6-1 through 7, 9-1, 2, 3, and 10 through 15, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendants requested the issuance and change of the status of stay of Defendant C to the Defendants, and sufficiently notified the Defendants that they should depart from Vietnam in order for Defendant C to be issued a visa for marriage immigrants. Defendant C visited the Immigration Office to obtain permission for change of status of stay.