건물명도
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On May 5, 2014, D agreed between the Defendant and the Defendant that “A lessee may remodel or alter the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant store”) to the Defendant at the lessee’s expense prior to the date of return of the real estate (hereinafter “instant lease”) with the lease deposit of KRW 1,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 100,000 (payment on May 5, 200), and the lease term of KRW 36 months for the lease contract (hereinafter “instant lease”).
B. After the death of a lessor D, the heir of the deceased D (hereinafter “the deceased”) completed the registration of transfer of shares on March 11, 2016 on the building in which the instant store was located on the ground of inheritance on November 24, 2015.
C. On April 21, 2016, the Plaintiffs agreed to purchase the said building and succeed to the lessor’s status of the instant lease agreement. The Defendant, a lessee, consented to the said succession, and the Plaintiffs completed the registration of ownership transfer as to each 1/2 co-ownership share of the said building on May 4, 2016.
After entering into the instant lease agreement, the Defendant operated multiple businesses without registering as a business operator at the instant store, and without paying the Plaintiffs a rent after September 2016, the Defendant occupied, used, and used the instant store until now.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Gap evidence 7-1 and 2, Gap evidence 8, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination as to the cause of claim
A. According to the facts of the recognition of the above request for extradition, the fact that the Defendant was in arrears for at least three years after September 2016 is acknowledged, and the fact that the duplicate of the complaint of this case, on January 23, 2017, stating the Plaintiffs’ intent to terminate the instant lease agreement on the grounds of the Defendant’s delinquency in rent, is evident that the duplicate of the complaint of this case was served on the Defendant.
Ultimately, the instant lease agreement is concluded.