2. In light of the following circumstances, the lower court’s duly adopted and investigated evidence may fully recognize the facts charged of this case in light of the following circumstances.

A. The victim is consistent from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, and the defendant, as stated in the facts charged of the instant case, “Is the sng sng sng sng sng sng sng

The expression “D” was made by taking a punishment for self-refluence.

was stated.

B. He also observed the instant case at the court of the court below that the Defendant took a bath as stated in the instant facts charged to the victim.

The statement was made by the Defendant, and the F also made it clear that it was made clear that the Defendant made the victim the Defendant’s expression “Faly fly fly,” “I will be punished by a fly fright.”

was stated.

(c)

The victim, on the day of the instant case, “the victim shall be punished by a fine for negligence in the Republic of Korea, and the person who is capable of drinking shall so end to the defendant without permission.

The message called “,” etc. was sent, which constitutes part of the bath theory written in the instant facts charged.

(d)

The defendant seems to have been rashing neighboring merchants, including ordinary victims, while operating a parking lot in the vicinity of the D Building in Yanan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, and in fact there was two times or more penalties in relation thereto.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.