2. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) there are many criminal records and criminal records committed by the Defendant due to inhalement of hallucinogenic substances; (b) the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes against the victims who performed official duties in the state of inhaleing hallucinogenic substances during the period of repeated crime; (c) the Defendant did not reach an agreement with the victims; (d) the Defendant was at a disadvantage; or (e) the Defendant was aware of his mistake and is in depth; (e) the injury inflicted upon the victims and the obstruction of the performance of official duties; (e) the victim deposited certain money for the victims; and (e) the Defendant deposited a certain amount of money for the victims; and (e) other sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, background

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.