A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years and for one year and six months, respectively.

Defendant

A Evidence No. 12.

2017 Highest 82 (Defendants) Defendants would provide loans to many and unspecified persons in fact with persons whose names are unknown, even though they do not have the intent or ability to provide loans.

기망하여 이에 속은 피해자들 로 하여금 피고인들이 인출이 가능한 계좌로 금원을 송금하게 하고, 성명을 알 수 없는 사람은 피고인들에게 위와 같이 금원이 송금된 계좌와 연결된 체크카드, 해당 비밀번호 등을 전달하고, 피고인들은 위 성명을 알 수 없는 사람으로부터 휴대전화 메신저 'QQ ‘를 통해 지시를 받아 위 체크카드 등의 사용 확인 여부를 확인하고 위 체크카드 등을 이용하여 익산시에 있는 상호 불상의 은행에서 현금을 인출하여 위 성명을 알 수 없는 사람이 지정한 계좌로 무통장 입금하고 그 대가로 월급과 인출 금액의 일부를 수수료로 받는 방법으로 불특정 다수의 사람들 로부터 금원을 편취하기로 순차 공모하였다.

1. Defendant A

A. On September 19, 2016, at a place where it is impossible to know the identity of the person whose name was fraud, the victim J calls at a place where it is unknown to him/her on September 19, 2016, and receives “in order to obtain a loan from a low-interest policy loan, the person must pay money to the account to meet the loan eligibility, and send it by creating a check card.

D. The phrase “assumed” made a false statement to the effect that “.”

However, there is no intention or ability to allow the victim to get a loan even if the person whose name is unknown received money from the injured party and received the check, etc. from the injured party.

Nevertheless, the defendant, in collusion with a person who could not know the above name, deceiving the victim as above, and let the victim communicate the above personal information, such as the physical card, password, the victim's name, the account number, etc. connected to the company bank account in the name of the victim.