게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months
However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. No person who commits a joint crime by a defendant A, B, or C shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging exchange or re-purchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game water;
Defendant
A around March 28, 2014, around 2014, around H Gameland, in the mutual game of the H Gameland located in the Geum-gu Busan, the game room 100 types of "Liquidation", "domination plaque", "Yeb", and "walren" game, and managed the proceeds of the game site. Defendant B is in charge of the recruitment of employees, settlement of profits, and the overall management of the night game hall, and Defendant C takes charge of the role of exchanging money in cash upon receiving the card with the points obtained by customers.
From March 28, 2014 to June 9, 2015, the Defendants: (a) had many unspecified customers who found their places in the said game place enter cash in the said game machine into money; and (b) had them use the said game machine; and (c) had them exchange the points they acquired from the said game machine after deducting 10% of commission from the money exchange merchant Defendant C.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to exchange the result of the use of game water for business purposes.
2. Defendant D’s crime of aiding and abetting and abetting Defendant D and E was committed from March 28, 2014 to June 9, 2015, Defendant E served as an employee under the condition that Defendant D would receive KRW 80,000 per day from February 28, 2015 to June 9, 2015, on condition that Defendant D would receive KRW 80,000 per day from February 1, 2015, Defendant E would receive KRW 50,000 per day, and Defendant A, B, and C would know that the game was engaged in the business of exchanging the game scores obtained from the head of the game, as described in the foregoing paragraph 1. However, Defendant A, B, and C, despite being aware that the game was engaged in the business of exchanging the game scores obtained from the general public, made it easier for Defendant A, B, and C to commit the crime.
Accordingly, the Defendants are listed in the above 1 paragraphs A, B, and C.