beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.10.31 2016가단5155716

대여금

Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to Defendant B Law Firm 2,006,079 won and 1,174,587 won among them

B. Defendant C shall be 42,723.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a lending company that has completed registration pursuant to the Act on Registration of Credit Business and Protection of Finance Users. Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant corporation”) is a law firm established pursuant to the Attorney-at-Law Act, and Defendant C is a person in charge of individual rehabilitation and bankruptcy as an employee belonging to Defendant corporation.

B. On October 2, 2013 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant Corporation, with respect to the remuneration and expenses to be paid by the clients of the Defendant Corporation to be provided with legal services, such as personal rehabilitation and bankruptcy, to the Defendant Corporation, the business suspension agreement was prepared between the Plaintiff and the Defendant Corporation, which provides the Plaintiff with the financial services and the Defendant Corporation jointly and severally guarantees the Defendant Company’s obligations to the Plaintiff for the loans to the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant agreement”). The term “B” as of the end of the said agreement is marked with the rubber name plate of the Defendant Corporation, and the seal impression of the Defendant Corporation is affixed next thereto, and as of the joint and several surety column “B”, the Defendant C’s signature and seal is affixed.

C. On the other hand, on July 7, 2015, between the Plaintiff and the Defendant Corporation, the agreement for temporary suspension of business (hereinafter “instant agreement”, “instant two agreements”, and “instant two agreements”). The end of the said agreement is the signature and seal of the representative of the Defendant Corporation in the name of the Defendant Corporation, and the seal impression of the Defendant Corporation is affixed, and there is no indication in the column for joint and several sureties of “B”.

Pursuant to the instant agreement 1, the Plaintiff carried out loan transactions No. 1 or 29 as indicated below, and carried out loans No. 30,31 pursuant to the instant agreement. The remaining loans and delay damages for each loan as of September 1, 2017 are listed below, and each loan interest rate is 34.9% per annum.

On April 2014, 1D 1D 2014.