Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

The Defendant: (a) around 16:00 on September 19, 2017, the victim C (70 years old) who was engaged in dry field work on the side of the 76 sperm-ro 19:0 YYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

I think of the victim and why the document would be brought about by entering South's house;

When the documents are not attached, the death shall be discarded.

“Although the victim made a statement to the purport that “,” the victim did not seem to have any response thereto, the victim sustained injury, such as the impairment (21cm in length on the blade, 40cm in length), which is a dangerous object carried by the victim, once per minute a part of the victim’s left side of the victim, and the loss of the above part, once per minute a part of the victim’s left side of the victim’s left side of the victim, resulting in approximately two weeks back to the left side of the victim, and then the victim suffered injury, such as other impairment of the wall and other impairment of the character.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Some statements made to the accused in the protocol of interrogation of the suspect to the prosecution (including the substitute part);

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. The photograph of the criminal implements, records of seizure, and list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts, photographs of victims, and written diagnosis;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances shall be considered):

1. Sentencing unfavorable reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act: In light of the background and method of the instant crime, motive of the crime, etc. of which the Defendant, who had a good appraisal against the victim, inflicted an injury on the victim as a dangerous object that may cause a serious injury, the sentence of sentence is not appropriate, and it is inevitable to view the risk of recidivism as having been committed.

The victim did not reach an agreement with the victim and the victim wanted to punish the defendant.

A favorable circumstances: The defendant is aged, and the injury caused by the crime of this case is relatively heavy.

For the recovery of damage, compensation shall be the damage.