beta
(영문) 광주지방법원목포지원 2016.08.10 2015가단4830

구상금

Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Within the scope of property inherited from the network T, Defendant A and Defendant A, either of the KRW 8,156,128, 3,671.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff’s display of the claim has a claim for indemnity by subrogated payment of the deceased’s debt pursuant to a credit guarantee agreement concluded with the deceased T (the deceased’s death on April 9, 2009; hereinafter “the deceased”). The Defendants, other than the Defendant H, as the inheritor of the deceased, received an adjudication from the court on acceptance of the report by filing a report on the inheritance limit approval.

Therefore, the remaining Defendants except Defendant H have the obligation to pay the Plaintiff the same money as the written order within the scope inherited from the Deceased, and Defendant H has the obligation to pay the Plaintiff the same money as the written order according to their inheritance shares.

2. Applicable provisions;

A. The remainder of the Defendants except Defendant G: Articles 208(3)2, 150(3), and 150(1) of the Civil Procedure Act (a) (a judgment as to whether to be deemed as a confession)

(b) Defendant G: Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act (Decision by public notice)