2. The crime of this case was committed by the Defendant on the ground that the latter victim was able to take the head debt of the victim on the ground that the latter victim was her bath, and was placed on the table, and caused the victim to suffer bodily injury, such as the closure of the inside and floor, the closure of the body, and the bones of the bones, which require treatment for about four weeks. There are favorable circumstances such as the Defendant’s recognition of all of the crime of this case and reflects on it, and the Defendant’s payment and agreement of the medical

However, it is recognized that the degree of injury suffered by the victim due to the crime of this case is serious, and that the defendant has been punished for several times in the past, and as a result of the application of the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Commission of the Supreme Court, the recommendation type for the crime of this case is within the scope of the above recommendation type as the punishment of the court below is within the scope of the above recommendation type as between April and June (i.e., "serious injury" as a special person (the grounds for aggravation and mitigation) and "the victim's penalty is not imposed" as a special person). The defendant's punishment is within the scope of the above recommendation type, and the defendant's age, character, character and environment, family relationship, circumstances leading to the defendant to the crime of this case, the means and result of the crime of this case, etc., and it is difficult to view that the punishment imposed by the court below

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.