성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(친족관계에의한강간)등
The Defendant’s motion to attach the instant attachment order is dismissed.
The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
1. The facts charged and the summary of the cause for requesting an attachment order [the facts charged] and the person against whom the Defendant and the person to whom the attachment order was requested (hereinafter “defendants”) are prone to the victim F (nife 12 years of age), and due to a divorce lawsuit filed with G from August 2009 to December 21, 201, the victim and Z (10 years of age) were living together with G.
On August 201, the Defendant, at the same time, committed sexual intercourse with the victim on the part of the victim, by putting the victim under the influence of alcohol in front of the new wall I apartment group I apartment group, having the victim under the influence of alcohol in the ward, taking the victim’s bath to the above G, making the victim fright, talking the victim’s chest and boat, forced the victim’s panty and panty, putting the victim’s finger into the part of the victim’s sexual flag, putting the victim’s sexual organ into the part of the victim’s sexual organ, inserting the victim’s sexual organ into the part of the victim’s sexual organ and the part of the victim’s resistance.
As a result, the defendant raped the victim of kinship and, at the same time, raped the minor under 13 years of age.
B. The Defendant, around September 201, at the time of the new wall of the date, had sexual intercourse with the victim, who had been engaged in the practice of friendship and dancing in the same place as described in paragraph (1) at the same time, and had been forced by force.
As a result, the defendant raped the victim of kinship and, at the same time, raped the minor under 13 years of age.
C. Around September 4, 2011, the Defendant forced the victim to have sexual intercourse in the same place under the same method as that of paragraph (1).
As a result, the defendant raped the victim's kinship and, at the same time, raped the minor under 13 years of age.
around October 2011, the Defendant had sexual intercourse with the victim by force in the same manner as Paragraph 1 at the new wall’s place above.
As a result, the defendant raped the victim of kinship and, at the same time, raped the minor under 13 years of age.
E. The Defendant is the victim of a new wall around November 11, 201.