beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.06.28 2017고정214

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving of CM5 passenger cars.

On December 30, 2016, the Defendant driven the aforesaid e-ray in front of the E, which is located in Jeju City, around 13:10 on December 30, 2016, and continued to proceed to the direction of the monthly salary of the number on the one side at the Han-dong side located in the Jeju City.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive in accordance with the signals by reducing speed and by properly examining the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to change the vehicle's proceeding signals to yellow signal, and neglected to follow the signal signal signals as they were, and caused the Defendant to go against, the victim F (44 ) who normally runs from the 2nd intersection intersection to the 4rd intersection intersection: high-speed signal apparatus at the end of the 3rd intersection, the left-hand part of the Lone Star Cargo Truck in G, which was driven by the Defendant, was the front-hand part of the vehicle.

Defendant 2 suffered injury to the victim, such as finite dinite dump, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment due to negligence in the above business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. Yellow dust survey report, black booms and caps and photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes (F);

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account all the circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing, such as the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the degree of negligence of the defendant, the degree of injury of the victim, the fact that the defendant's vehicle was covered by the comprehensive automobile insurance, and the age, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc.