공사대금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 102,895,353 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 6% per annum from February 1, 2015 to February 1, 2018.
In full view of the purport of the entire arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, the plaintiff's assertion as stated in the grounds for the written application (Provided, That the plaintiff, the creditor, and the debtor refers to the defendant) can be acknowledged. According to such factual basis, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff the money as stated in the Disposition No. 1.
With respect to the payment order requested by the Plaintiff, there is no specific content that the Defendant could block the Plaintiff’s claim of this case, and the Defendant was absent on the date of pleading without submitting a written reply containing its specific arguments.
Conclusion: Plaintiff’s winning