A. The Party E died on November 5, 2013.

F is the spouse of the network E, and the children of the Plaintiff B (ma), G (mam), Plaintiff A (mam) and Defendant C (ma), and Defendant D (ma) are children of the network E.

B. The Plaintiff: (a) donated 4,978С 224,00,000, prior to the wife population of the deceased E, to the wife population of H, 135,200 square meters prior to the wife population of H, 138 square meters; (b) Defendant C2, 3,073 square meters prior to the wife population of H; (c) Defendant C2, 138,285,000 square meters prior to the wife population of the deceased E-si; (d) Defendant C2, 1,208,475,000 square meters 1,208,475,000 square meters prior to the wife of Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si; (e) Defendant C2,329 square meters 2,506,000 square meters; and (e) Defendant C had no dispute over the ownership transfer registration of the above land under the name of the party to the transaction; and (e) Defendant C acquired the ownership transfer registration under the name of the above land under the name of the Party C.

According to the statement No. 3-4 of the certificate of Evidence No. 205,170,00 gift 205,000 square meters in the 6-si L-si L-si L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based 33,50,170,00. However, there is no dispute between the parties who donated the above land by Defendant C-based 1 due to the same circumstance as indicated in the statement No. 1).

55,383,99 Gifted Defendant D9 1.0