Text

1. The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The facts of the claim (1) on November 22, 201, the Defendant leased the land and the automobile maintenance shop (hereinafter referred to as “instant real estate”) on its own owned by the Defendant to the Plaintiff, a motor vehicle maintenance business operator: (a) upon entering into a special agreement, the terms and conditions that “the Plaintiff, a lessee, may use it for the Sejong Vice General within the limit permitted by the Act” are stated in the contract; (b) on April 17, 2012, the original Defendant again entered into a lease agreement with the lessee (from 0,000,000 won to 20,000 won to 30,000 won to 4,000 won to 1,000 won to 2,000 won to 2,000 won to 30,000 won to 1,000 won to 2,000 won to 2,000 won to 3,000,000 won to 3,000 won to 1,000 won to 2.