If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The Defendant is a person who operates a real estate consulting office with each other in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

On May 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the complainant D, “I am her draft, and return the principal to I am her only three million won, while I am her back the principal.”

However, even if the complainant borrowed the above money, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the amount of damage.

The defendant employs the complainant as above, and he received 3 million won immediately from the complainant and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the loan certificate;

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.