위증
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant actively made a false statement despite being aware of the existence of the grounds for refusal of witness at the time of the instant testimony. As such, the defendant did not actually obstruct the exercise of the right to refuse to testify due to failure to be notified of the right to refuse to testify, and the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant of the facts charged in this case
2. Determination
A. On February 17, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on February 17, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence on August 14, 201.
On January 12, 2012, at the Busan District Court No. 353, which is located in the Busan District Court 15:45, Jan. 15, 2012, in Busan District Court No. 353, which is located in the So-gu Busan District Court, the Defendant responded to the prosecutor’s question, “When the witness makes a true statement, how the witness would be how he would purchase the philop as D through a express bus terminal,” “I would like to write the philop and make a fraudulent statement to the witness,” and the prosecutor’s question, “I would not have received money from the defendant and sent the philopopon,” and the prosecutor’s answer to the witness “I would also have purchased the philopon from October 208.”
However, on September 2008, the Defendant transferred KRW 2,50,000 to C, and then purchased 10 g of the Mesofter (one philopon; hereinafter “philopon”) sent by C from a bus terminal in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, by receiving 10 g of the Melopon (one philopon; hereinafter “philopon”), and 50,000 won to police officers among October 2008.