2. The judgment was not agreed with the victim, and the defendant was charged with the same fine.

However, in full view of the following: (a) the Defendant is recognized as committing a crime; (b) the Defendant and the victim committed a contingent crime while having a vagabonds between the Defendant and the victim; (c) the Defendant deposited five million won for the victim; and (d) the relationship between the Defendant and the victim; (c) the motive and method of committing the crime; and (d) other various sentencing conditions stated in the records of the instant case, such as the circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too uneas

3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is dismissed on the ground of appeal.