난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. During the process of the disposition, the Plaintiff’s non-professional employment (E-9) in employment (E-9) on February 4, 2009 of the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea on February 4, 2015 (hereinafter “instant disposition”) and the reason for refugee non-recognition: (i) the decision of March 26, 2015 on March 26, 2015 of the date of the application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”): The fact that there is no ground for rejection of the decision of the Supreme Court on April 13, 2015 of the date of the application for objection that the notification of the decision of December 22, 2016 does not have any ground for rejection; (ii) Gap’s evidence 1, 2, Eul’s evidence 1, and 2; and (iii
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is the nationality of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “Pakic Republic”).
There is a conflict between the Plaintiff’s Pak Skak Village in the Republic of Korea, and the Plaintiff’s father, after entering the Republic of Korea, threatened the Plaintiff’s husband, and the Plaintiff’s return to the Pakakakakak is obviously likely to be threatened with the Pakak Skak Forest, and thus, it is obvious that the Plaintiff would be threatened with the Pakakak skak shot. Therefore, refugee status should be recognized.
B. Determination 1) Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines refugee status as “a foreigner who is unable to be protected or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to a well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion, or a foreigner who is a state of nationality unable to return to or does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea due to such fear.” 2) In full view of the evidence and evidence set forth in subparagraph 3 as well as the following circumstances that can be known in addition to the purport of the pleading as a whole, it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff has “a well-founded fear of being injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion.”